what is gavin menzies’ theory

9. With regard to the Piri Reis map, it is exactly what it says it is. Both recorded events of this world with utmost objectivity, and all is written down with great accuracy. But Menzies only claims there is such evidence. Gavin Menzies in his book "1421, the year China discovered the world" (2005, Betseller in the United States), states that Chinese ships under the direction of Zheng He a sailor and Chinese adventurer, reached the shores of America (probably in what is now the coasts of the States of Guerrero or Oaxaca, in Mexico) in 1418 (due to the dating of the world map below), 74 years … Put new text under old text. [17] He often refers back to his sea-faring days to support claims made in 1421. Gavin is probably the most important historical figure since Darwin. Felipe Fernández-Armesto, a professor of history at Tufts University in the United States and at Queen Mary, University of London, examined Menzies' claim that private papers of Columbus indicate a Chinese ambassador in correspondence with the Pope and called this claim "drivel." Anyone with knowledge of Hemp would know that it was found established in the New World. This article first appeared in the Atlanta Journal Constitution and is reprinted with permission. Sea. "And what does whether or not I speak or read Chinese have to do with anything? A study last year said the ink on the parchment map was made in the 20th century. [15], Bonomi contacted the firm Midas Public Relations to convince a major newspaper to run a promotional article for Menzies's book. I think that it deserves more research and less critisism. And why did you chose "mystical" as your modifier of choice, save to imply to your reader than Menzies is a loon. I think you may be missing the main point. This simple example also carries the lives of Galilleo, Copernicus and other 'truthful' scientists. Greatly expanding on the blockbuster 1421, distinguished historian Gavin Menzies and his co-author, Ian Hudson, uncover the complete untold history of how mankind came to populate the Americas by sea, over several millennia. [12] Critics have challenged the depth of his nautical knowledge. Menzies replies by stating that there are over 6,000 references that support the idea of ‘diffusion theory’. It is for sure a lot of work, no one can deny. If it was done, then it was done in a much more competent manner than the theories described in 1421. - A. Amazing how people can only see what they want to see. :-) There's an Oriental thought that I'd just like to share, before disappearing from this place for good:- 'If one is to point his or her finger to a fully-rounded moon, though the person may not be perfect, it doesn't stop the moon from being so.' But that is the mindset of the Chinese then, Can we blame Confucius ? Interestingly, after reading 1421, I've started to do some research myself. The asteroid has been officially dated by scientists not involved with the 1421 project. the DNA evidence supposedly linking the American Indians and Chinese; fails Thus, in my hypothesis, many Chinese had indirectly stopped many of the possible scientific advances - for the Chinese new discoveries were aiming to make the human life enjoyable - and they have stopped from that point.. or the intellectuals realized that beyond the practical use of gunpowder can be "damaging" and that may go against the "grains" of Confucian ethics ? Not once did China, if you would so willingly to agree on her wealth, power and influence then, invaded or INtended to invade, any other country in that period. In that, the wisdom of the Chinese, I am still hypothesizing, had often the Chinese sensed in what damages that can be done by human intelligence. You can find details at http://www.teamworkfilms.com Here's to great explorers and mathematicians! That map was included in the book. marred by questionable scholarship. [16] Menzies claims he sailed the routes sailed by Ferdinand Magellan and James Cook while he was commanding officer of the diesel submarine HMS Rorqual between 1968 and 1970,[16] a contention questioned by some of his critics. Be that of the European ethnicentrism or “hero” worship of the audacious explorers and adventurers. My Mexican and Peruvian friend believes that their ancestors may have been of Chinese descent as well. Mr. Poon : - Hoaxes are sometimes harmless but not in this case. If he has been working on this book for 14 years what did he do for the 20 years before that? climate...was far warmer than it is today" (p. 306). Historians have rejected Menzies' theories and assertions[4][5][6][7][8] and have categorised his work as pseudohistory.[9][10][11]. --> Constantly? Why the hell, these Chinese who went all over the world avoid so carefully Europe and the Mediterranean? "Furnish's challenges to this book were quite clear. Italy and all the warring dukes, kings and all ? Mr. Poon: - The ocean currents which have been deleted from the map of the south Atlantic refers to the map in chapter 4 (page 95 of the hard cover edition) and not to the Piri Reis map. Where on earth can you show 'REAL evidence' of, say a thousand years' old civilisation, if DNA and carbon-dating aren't even your top choice for evidence and history-writting? Last summer, Ms Olin and other researchers announced that carbon-14 dating of the parchment showed it was made around 1434 - exactly the right time for the map to be genuine. That was the logical way exploration was done by all maritime cultures - from the Inuit or the Northmen in the Northern seas - to the Polynesians in the Southern seas. We all remember the most brutal pirate of the Carribeans – Cook, was knighted by the Queen of England by his loot of the booties from Spain ? [15], The finished copy of the book was published in 2002 as 1421: The Year China Discovered the World (published as 1421: The Year China Discovered America in the United States). I suggest that you have some backing before you get your knickers in a twist and go around name calling. The New York Times bestselling author of offers another stunning reappraisal of history, presenting compelling new evidence that traces the roots of the. And had yet converted the gunpowerders into the cannons made by the West later. This is a miracle. Please stop the ad hominem attacks and tell me just exactly WHERE I am wrong in my criticisms. [7] Finlay wrote: Unfortunately, this reckless manner of dealing with evidence is typical of 1421, vitiating all its extraordinary claims: the voyages it describes never took place, Chinese information never reached Prince Henry and Columbus, and there is no evidence of the Ming fleets in newly discovered lands. Have we not heard of in Chinese in that saying as " Intelligence will be wronged by intelligence" Can ths mindset was where the king of Ming had all the data of Zheng He destroyed when the kingdom had chosen to seal themselves ? I am now up to chapter 16, but I couldn’t help but started to do my own research. Have you read all of Mr. Menzies' book? - Again, Full-stop. In comparison, only 40 years after Columbus potatoes where well known in Italy. I look forward to serious scholars testing every one of his hypotheses. I want to see more proof. He has made me curious about himself as well as Chinese navigation! I don't care whether Menzies is right or wrong. But could there be a form of reaction from their "black death" in the Middle Ages ? It is obvious - just by looking at the maps - that the South Atlantic compass rose on the Piri Reis map (which is stated in the book to mark the position of the Falkland islands) does not really mark the true position of the Falkland islands. I believe these were ballast from the Chinese ships constructed into docks/piers for repairs just as Menzies explains in greater detail. gavin menzies is a historian. As copied from the Singapore's 27/11/2003 Newspaper. To cite just four examples, he: never provides Menzies often fails to provide corroborating data for many of his claims. - A mí también, como cuando escriben sobre el "descubrimiento" de América, Mr. Colonna - That's a pretty good analysis of the book '1421' - Sure DNA evidence is good evidence. It is not guesswork. Gavin Menzies is here with me now to discuss more on his book and theories, including of course your latest findings - and there have been several - even since the book has been published. It's sad to say but it's a fairly nationalistic country as well. Rowan Gavin Paton Menzies (14 August 1937 – 12 April 2020)[1][2][3] was a British author and retired submarine lieutenant-commander who has written books promoting claims that the Chinese sailed to America before Columbus. Thanks. It has so many common points with the western ones that it makes think more than reasonably, that there had to be a common source: could it be a lost civilization, maybe the same one which has been chased by thousands years so far?” Have you seen this before? "almost persuaded.". Who could have charted and surveyed these lands before they were 'discovered'? Gavin Menzies: 'It is amazing how splenetic academics can be - such a different world from the Navy' ... even if they disagree with his theory. War, military, mobilizaing of forces, use of weapons, ballistics.. have made the West strong, powerful and followed by now the Economics..the trade, the currency control and wrold bank. Where do you find a better choice of scientific determination, as to which type of living/ non-living beings are related to each other, than a DNA evidential link? Bantam Press stated that the book possessed enormous marketing potential, but considered it to be poorly written and sloppily presented. Perhaps some hoaxers do have a capacity for hoaxing themselves- as well as others, but it really isn’t plausible that the author could be so confused about the basics of seamanship and navigation. After all is said and done, I'll just like to say this: to each his own, Mr Furnish. Mom with COVID delivered baby she couldn't hold Gavin Menzies divides his theory about the Chinese sailing to America into two main hypotheses. There's no reason to believe that Chinese seafarers would have been any less logical in their seamanship. The 1421 website (subject line above)is fascinating, full of thought provoking information and evidence. Why? Rowan Gavin Paton Menzies (14 August 1937 – 12 April 2020) was a British author and retired submarine lieutenant-commander who has written books promoting claims that the Chinese sailed to America before Columbus. Perhaps that's a natural mistake to make because we live in an era where there are a lot of government controls on everything and nowadays maps are commissioned and controlled by governments. Let's celebrate them all! We don't regard it as an historical book, but as a narrative one. You may also want to look closely at some of the other sketch maps in the book which show ocean currents. But none of this is relevant, either.) When completing ‘1421’ he came across the Zuane Pizzigano chart for the first time. If he has no documentation he is just blowing hot air. I think he makes some good points and is probably right. Weighing the Evidence for Alternative History: This page was last edited on 12 February 2021, at 12:13. Lo voy a anunciar a mis compatriotas. Recently posted: an asteroid impact in 1422 created a huge tsunami, wrecking several ships of the Chinese fleet, slamming them into New Zealand. Maybe not "bitter," but definitely condenscending. Even if Menzies were right about the Chinese discovery of the New World--and there are tantalizing aspects to his thesis, such as the strangely accurate pre-Columbian maps of parts of the Atlantic, as well as the biological evidence of pre-Columbian Old and New World contacts--that would not change the fact that it was the Europeans who colonized the new lands and came to dominate the globe."
Aloe Vera Overnight Hair Mask, How Taurus Deals With Divorce, Loki Quotes Mythology, Truly Devious Book 5, Alison Schumer Age, Sitrep Army Study Guide, Cuisinière Frigidaire Pièces, Beach Chair Acnh,